Bank Profile: The First State Bank of Rosemount Reviews

What the The First State Bank of Rosemount reviews figures actually show

Start with one distinction: what we publish for The First State Bank of Rosemount are medians, not averages.

A median is the midpoint: half of the institution sits above it and half below. Averages get dragged around by a handful of extreme values — one very expensive property, one unusually large loan, one graduate earning far more than their classmates — so a median is the safer number to plan against. Total assets of $146 million and branch count of 2.

Treat these as a baseline for opening a savings, checking or CD account, not a quote. Your own position depends on details no dataset holds: credit history, the exact street, the specific product on offer this week.

What these numbers mean for savers comparing where to keep their money

Context does most of the work here. A number is only high or low next to something else, so we publish The First State Bank of Rosemount and how it sits inside Minnesota against a wider benchmark on the same measure. Headquarters of Rosemount, Minnesota.

Small gaps tell you nothing — sampling error alone can produce them. Large gaps almost always have a physical cause: the age of the housing stock, commuting distance, the balance between renters and owners, or a single large employer setting local pay.

That is why a single figure should never carry a decision on its own. Read two or three measures together — what comes in, what housing costs, what is left — and the picture stops being ambiguous.

Where The First State Bank of Rosemount sits against the wider market

Comparison is the fastest way to tell a genuinely unusual institution from an ordinary one. We benchmark The First State Bank of Rosemount against Minnesota and against the national picture on the same definitions, in the same period, so the difference you see is a real difference rather than an artefact of two datasets disagreeing.

Most contradictory statistics you meet online are definition mismatches rather than errors. Gross versus net, occupied versus advertised, applications versus originations: each pair produces a different headline from the same underlying reality.

Any measure the source flags as unreliable is dropped rather than smoothed. That is why some pages carry fewer figures than others: the institution itself is thinly sampled.

A short checklist before you act

None of this needs a spreadsheet. It needs the discipline of checking the same handful of things every time, whether you are opening a savings, checking or CD account for the first time or the fifth.

• Confirm the rate you were quoted is the standard rate, not a promotional tier that resets after a few months.
• Check the minimum balance and the monthly maintenance fee, which can quietly outweigh the interest earned.
• Check the fee schedule and the fine print, not the headline rate — that is where the real cost usually hides.
• Ask what the number looks like in a bad year, not an average one, and make sure the plan still holds.
• Write down the monthly number you can genuinely cover, not the maximum a lender or admissions office says you qualify for.
• Compare at least three offers. Pricing on the same product varies more between providers than most people expect, and the gap is yours to keep.

Questions people ask about The First State Bank of Rosemount

Sources, method and limits

The page is assembled from quarterly regulatory filings, specifically the FDIC Institution Directory and Summary of Deposits (2026-09-16). Nothing here is modelled from a proprietary black box: every figure traces to a published record, and where we derive a ratio we show both inputs so the arithmetic can be checked.

The limits are the usual three: sampling error grows as geography shrinks, published data always trails reality by months or years, and a midpoint says nothing about the extremes at either end of the institution.

Where a source revises a figure, the revised value replaces the old one rather than sitting alongside it, so the page always reflects the current official position. If you spot a number that looks wrong, it is worth telling us — corrections get made against the source record, not by guesswork.